Are We, Or Aren't We...

... in a recession?

No one truly knows, although many have an opinion, and depending on political stripe... we either are or we aren't. And it is always because something is a clear sign. Never mind, those government stats containing revisions from previous months, it must be deemed as absolute. 

Then there are the BIG money folks, that have gotten rich off QE and want those glory days to return... meaning the FED to reverse policy. BIG money really needs there to be a recession for that to happen and will lobby long and hard, that we are already in a recession and are betting on the FED to ease off rate hikes, etc. 

GDP gets revised a couple of times and then is revised once a year thereafter. 

Yep... revised from a negative in June 2015, to a positive in one month after third release and by 2021, was downright stellar.

Citing GDP as some guarantee, one way or the other... is based on something likely to be revised. Besides, it might just be possible that the 3rd quarter of this year could be positive. Would that mean the recession is over?

Employment situation... the word revised is used 4 times in the latest report. This month...

The change in total nonfarm payroll employment for May was revised up by 2,000, from

+384,000 to +386,000 https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/empsit_08052022.htm

The previous month...

The change in total nonfarm payroll employment for April was revised down by 68,000, from +436,000 to +368,000, and the change for May was revised down by 6,000, from +390,000 to +384,000 https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/empsit_07082022.htm

Which is it? 

My goal is not to cast doubt on government reports, but putting my heart and soul into a specific set of data as gospel... is just plain foolish, in my opinion. 

Earlier I mentioned the possibility of a 3rd QTR GDP print being positive. I base that on the blowout of trade balance and how it impacted the 1st two Quarters.

The trade deficit started blowing out in 3rd Qtr. 2020 and then accelerated, with another major drop down in the 1st Qtr, and barely easing the 2nd Qtr. That would be the period when our business leaders went nuts with over ordering. That may ease back a bit going forward. 

In an alternate universe, where the trade imbalance did not drop so dramatically, the 1st Qtr. GDP would have been +2.3% and 2nd Qtr. at +1.6%

Of course on the potential negative side is the extreme jump in credit. I have no idea how much longer that can last, but with the Federal Reserve ready to push up rates further... something's got to give, in my opinion. BUT, that set of data might likely also be revised. 

There is an old adage of "When your neighbor is out of a job... it's a recession. When you're out of a job... it's a depression". Probably the most accurate of all metrics!

Now for MY opinion. We are not in a recession yet. We may soon be, but the severity is unknown, until we are actually in the middle of it. I would say that any looming recession in the U.S. will be exacerbated by the current economic morass of Europe. 

I am trying to get a grasp on why Germany's trade balance is narrowing, when the Euro is cheaper now than 1 year ago. Is it difficulty in obtaining necessary materials to manufacture items? Is it the high cost of Natural Gas that is offsetting any gains from the weak Euro? Is it a combination of both, or several other factors. 

I don't know, but do worry about the impacts on Europe as a whole, which would include the U.K. in this instance. The natural gas issue, will not go away anytime soon, in my opinion. The materials issues are likely not to go away anytime soon, as well. 

This appears to be a very challenging time for Western Civilization. 

We seem to have a situation where many folks are being duped by big money into believing we are already in a recession, which could cause a recession via lack of confidence. Be careful what you wish for. 

Of course, we also have folks in the U.S. eagerly anticipating and repeating statements of a C.O.L.A. being above 10.5% or more, without considering how much additional inflation is required to get us to that level. But then, the point might be to inflate expectations and then cry foul, when it doesn't happen. Be careful what you wish for.

Allow Me To Butt In, With a Rebuttal of Sorts

Here is the premise...

Some politician said it is the patriotic duty of gasoline suppliers to reduce costs and some rich dude says the politician is misdirecting or unaware of how the market works. This happened to flow right into some of my social media accounts.

This prompted one poster to reply with this. I won't do a screen capture, as it might be some violation of something. You can open the link. Crude Oil (WTI) is up 40% and Gasoline is up 60%, both from 1 year ago. It does seem to support the theory, that gasoline prices are out of line.

The problem being WTI and Brent are Global Benchmarks and Gasoline is basically a U.S. market... benchmark. So why is this? (click to enlarge)

This seems to have started diverging last fall. Here is the Price history of WTI Crude and Gasoline Futures. Which seems to be the product of exporting more gasoline than importing. For that information, here is the export history and the import history. (Weekly, in thousand of barrels).

IF gasoline futures had stayed in line with WTI, the futures would be around $3.44 and we (U.S.) would be averaging around $4.29 at the pump... nationally, and we would still be griping. 😭

I made this easy(?) to read graph on the difference...

Yes, we have upped the exports of gasoline and thereby forced the gasoline futures to battle with global pricing structures... just to keep gasoline in the USA. 

I didn't check on every country, as various countries are subsidizing, but I do keep tabs on the U.K. Even when factoring in the U.K. using a bit higher octane rating, the U.S. gasoline is a bit cheaper... when backing out taxes. This is not intended to explain away U.S. prices, but rather the nature of global pricing structures.

As to the patriotic theme, that is clearly intended for an American audience that sees a familiar name and thinks of it as an AMERICAN brand. In fact, they are Multi-National (Global) Enterprises. So they likely are being patriotic... but to what nationality?

Our patriotic politicians could reinstate the crude oil export ban, that was overturned in late 2015, and it would bring down the WTI price, but does not help the gasoline side of the equation, as there were no limits on gasoline exports. 

Has releasing 1 million barrels a day from the SPR done anything? Why yes, it has kept the WTI from going through the roof and gasoline following a similar track. 

Speaking of the SPR, with the draw of 1 million barrels per day to end at end of October... the U.S. is already planning to replenish those barrels.

Not sure what that will do to crude or gasoline futures, but there will be somebody, somewhere, ready to complain and blame someone. That someone will always be of the opposite political persuasion. 

It is sad to watch... but somehow, very entertaining as well. 

As for the Crude oil and petroleum products, much the same trend, for those interested...

Weather or Not! Why Not!

3 times this past week, the notion of a tropical storm or hurricane has popped up on a certain weather forecasting model. It was the only model to indicate this potential and subsequent models did not reflect any such movements.

For the record this one and only model indicated a storm likely moving across the Florida panhandle on the 24th. A day later... nothing. A couple of days later, the indication was a storm likely moving over New Orleans on the 29th. Then nothing. Today it shows a strong disturbance just south of Cuba. Tomorrow will likely show nothing. Only one model has shown anything... all others nothing.

I am NOT forecasting a hurricane or a tropical storm in the near future... or even one at all. My point is about how 50% of the USA petroleum refining capacity is along the Gulf Coast, as well as LNG terminals.

Current inventories of crude and the various petroleum products are below the seasonal range of normal inventory. A gander at the weekly report from the EIA.gov quickly indicates the dilemma we are in. To clarify what below the seasonal range actually means... lowest of the past 5 years, based on this time of year.

We've had massive storms in the past, but were able to weather the storm, due to sufficient inventories. It would not take much of a storm to skyrocket prices from current levels. The potential for a tropical storm along the Gulf Coast, is not an unreasonable forecast for sometime this summer. 

That is my point, weather you like it or not. 

Strategic Petroleum Reserve and Politics?

I have read a couple of times, where our leaders have asked OPEC and others to turn on the oil spigot to overcome some shortages of crude. I have even read where the president has "released" some crude out of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR).

On the other hand, "we are trying to talk" about reducing fossil fuel consumption, particularly now that COP26 is underway. I say trying to talk, because I doubt anything meaningful will be adopted, except for promises yet to be broken... again.

I am not the brightest bulb in the pack, but it would seem to me that a commitment to reduce reliance on fossil fuels would also consider a plan to reduce the SPR over time. While this might seem an odd thing to do, it would reduce the current inflationary effects of crude prices as well as send a signal that we are moving away from this fossil fuel. 

Naturally an argument could be made that this method would cheapen the market price of fossil fuels, which would prolong their consumption, while reducing the current state of semi-independence for imported fossil fuels. However, I would consider a gradual reduction to be in order. Something akin to a planned reduction of 170,000 barrels per day for 10 years.

Of course, there is the horse and buggy phenomenon.  I am referring to the period where cars started to become mass produced. The horse and buggy industry saw the writing on the wall, ceased expansion and began reduction of inventory, etc., which became very profitable for a brief period, until the industry virtually faded away. 

We are seeing the beginning states of this in the U.S. oil production companies, in my opinion. It is quite a tightrope to walk between keeping these producers operating at near net import/export levels or accelerating the reduction in U.S. Oil. 

The origins of the SPR are rooted in the 1970s and an oil embargo. Here is a brief overview, entitled... History of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. Here is some SPR Quick Facts. Then there is the IEA, with The global oil market remains vulnerable to a wide range of risk factors. Which states in part...

In accordance with the Agreement on an International Energy Programme (I.E.P.), each IEA country has an obligation to hold emergency oil stocks equivalent to at least 90 days of net oil imports. 

Which brings me to current situation... (the upper cut off is the 90 day line, which was broken through at various times in the early 90s and has been above that threshold since 2-2012)

Currently, the total volume of SPR is 614.2 Millions Barrels. Here is the 4 week net average of imports/exports from the EIA. Whatever measure... the 90 day rule applies would indicate a net import of 6.8M barrels per day... a figure not seen that high in 8 years. Currently it is running in the 1M barrels per day and below range. 

Clearly, the internal production of the U.S. oil industry could begin to fall to the wayside, if crude prices were to fall, and it is understood that financing of the industry could begin to subside, but at some point near the end it would collapse. 

Hence the politics angle. Any suggestion of sizable reduction at this point would be a nightmare for certain D.C. politicians of both stripes. There are those beholden to the oil industry, which would receive a dramatic drop in prices and those beholden to the green energy sector, for allowing a drop in energy prices to prolong the use of fossil fuels. 

That is why I would suggest that slow drawdown over a long period. No one really wins.

But that is just my silly idea, and I realize the notion of releasing a fossil fuel during a global climate meeting is preposterous. Not addressing the SPR is kicking the oil can down the road, imo. Not unlike what the global community is doing with climate change.

Light At The End Of The Tunnel?

 

Courtesy of U.S.C.G.

We are awash in shipping containers, with railyards, rail lines, trucking companies, ports, harbors, etc. 

How did we get here and when will it end?

Covid did create a disruption and one the just-in-time inventory management system has struggled to adjust. It has taken about 35 years to develop what was a mostly very efficient, mostly smooth movement of goods. As this transition took place, the need for massive warehouses was reduced with the reduction of manpower required to keep those warehouses operating. 

As efficiency improved, the requirement for trucking, rails, etc. was also reduced... with the manpower required to maintain and operate. 

That was all and good, until Covid, which not only created shutdowns, uneven distribution, but also a massive shift in consumer spending habits. We had China nearly shutdown, which impacted industries and retailers in the U.S., which may or may not have taken advantage of impending goods shortages, to shutter operations for the good of their employees. This put a lot of stuff in the wrong place.

Then we had the so-called legitimate shutdowns, which were region by region and even county by county. A very uneven shutdown, to say the least. Then there was a very uneven re-opening, with some rushing to re-start, while others resisted these efforts. During all of this, there was a gigantic shift in consumer habits, which accelerated during all the stimulus period.

One only needs to look at the BEA's GDP numbers associated with good and services, and see a dramatic shift to goods, both durable and non-durable, with a sizable reduction in services. Goods have increased about 18% over 1st qtr. 2020, with about half being in 3rd qtr. 2020, holding steady in 4th, then accelerating in the 1st and 2nd quarters of 2021.

In addition, the importation of goods followed a similar pattern, with about a 12% increase over that period. Such surges are difficult to prepare for, in such a short period of time. Essentially... Just-in-time has been erased for the foreseeable future.

Clearly, the system while not broken... is in disarray. There are glimmers of hope going forward. Here are a few articles that seem to be clearing the fog of misinformation, imo.

• Containers Piling Up At U.S. Rail Yards Add to Port Strains
• More truckers won't solve US port congestion, supply chain issues: Harbor Trucking Association CEO
• Rail freight is at the center of the supply chain crisis
• UP metering domestic intermodal out of Chicago, Memphis

Even recognition of TOO many containers (Lot of empties) as a problem and potential action by the State of California... by executive order of the Governor.

Everyone is trying to avoid being the Grinch that stole Christmas. Not to mention it is important to shift blame to the average person for leaving the workforce at this time and proclaim "worker" shortage. 

From the St. Louis FED... THE COVID RETIREMENT BOOM. 

So we made the system more efficient by reducing the workforce and now proclaim we need more workers. 

Good Luck!