Showing posts with label congress. Show all posts
Showing posts with label congress. Show all posts

Thursday, March 31, 2022

End of the Month... So February 2022 Inflation Numbers and Other Stuff.

 

With the PCE index report this morning, we can wrap up all the February inflation numbers. Granted, some slight improvement was seen in some areas, but still double digit increases on the upstream models seem to suggest more inflation to the consumer.

There does seem to be some potential for deceleration in core inflation, as decreased purchasing power is becoming more widespread. Inventories of retail and wholesale have increase ahead of inflation. Normally this could be seen as wonderful news, but it is hard to keep a straight face over lingering claims of supply chain shortages and increases in inventories, in my opinion. 

We all know that supply v demand is the determinant of pricing. If demand goes up and supply can't keep up... prices increase. Demand falls and supply increases... prices decrease. The past year saw demand pumped up with various stimulus checks and which contributed to "supply chain" issues. The benefit of that additional money is waning as retail sales minus inflation are flat to lower. Even more so with energy and food pulled from the equation.

As stated, core items might fall in the coming months, but what about energy and food?

Energy is struggling to supply to meet the demand. Regardless of any Strategic Petroleum Reserve activity... the demand will need to decrease for price relief. Going into the summer driving season, I am not so sure that will take place before August. Besides, that 1-million-barrel daily release will likely be exported, which may have impact on global prices, which may in turn trickle down to the US Consumer... eventually. We must remember the previous release announced last fall has not yet been completed. The 30 Million barrel release announced in March has not started, so just how quick will this happen?

Maybe in time for the midterms, but then you have the other headline issue...

Food, which accounts for about 14% of the Average American expense, compared to 8% for energy (>4% for Gasoline). Food is the one item that rarely sees a decline in demand and usually an increase as the global population is still growing. It really is all about supply and weather impacts of the past couple of years has NOT been conducive to slowing food price inflation. Throw in the Ukraine invasion and this is not an area that will likely seen any leveling off unless we get a good global weather pattern for crops and peace breaks out quick in war torn areas. 

Food is likely to be the issue for the next couple of years. A case could be made that Russia invaded Ukraine to control its large agriculture industry, to which it could use as influence amongst its friends, etc. Whatever the reason, it has clearly backfired, and the global community will become increasingly unsettled over food insecurity.

We will likely see the CPI in the mid 8% range in March's report and higher the following month. Much will be made about the high price of gasoline, but the food component is the real long-term story.

Forget the Oscars, as inflation is about to give us all a slap in the face. 

Friday, February 25, 2022

Near End of the Month, So January 2022 Inflation Numbers and Other Stuff.

 


ALL the inflation numbers are in and they are pointing upward, with the exception of PPI, which was flat. But the leading indicators of PPI are still in double digits. 

Quite a bit of chatter regarding energy prices and how they will ramp up inflation. There is no denying that, but every single number that excludes food and energy is up as well. Don't be misled by headlines screaming energy costs are going to cause double digit inflation. 

We might very well see double digit inflation, but if everything stays flat and energy were to drive up the overall inflation... then crude would need to be in the $180 @ bbl. We will be in recession, well before that occurs. Energy is a part of inflation, but not the entire story. Attempting to backward blame inflation on solely energy and current geo-politics, is to ignore the inflation prior to these events.

Those inflation factors are still prevalent and really no let up going forward the next couple of months. Previously the inflation was anticipated to peak in February (numbers due out in March), but those energy related and geo-political issues might edge up succeeding months. We were in the May/June timeframe of any year over year relief... which is prior to certain current events.

There is talk of the FED backing off rate hikes but maybe a bit premature. Granted the FED is looking for any excuse to avoid lifting rates, but they are behind the curve, so will raise rates, to make room for lowering them later on. 

As for Ukraine... they are not a member of the EU or of NATO, but a member of the UN. 30+ years ago, Iraq invaded Kuwait, which was also a member of the UN. A coalition was quickly and rapidly formed to kick Iraq out. Kuwait had oil, Ukraine not so much. 

Not sure how this thing will turn out, but it will soon become old news and everyone will move on. That is the sad state of things. There will be a period of media pictures and videos of bombs exploding, missiles being launched, but then this will become boring and no longer a driver of news ratings. 

Not unlike Covid, which still has a high death rate, but somehow is cured... at least to the extent it does not make more than a ripple in the news. Everyone is racing to get back to normal, which means accepting certain unpleasant facts. 

Currently the forecast for February CPI numbers (Due out in March 10th) stands in the range of 7.63% to 7.9%. 7.62% was the annual rate in February 1982. January 1982 was 8.39%.


Friday, January 28, 2022

Near End of the Month, So December 2021 Inflation Numbers and Other Stuff.


It's all the inflation numbers in one chart. As always, the MPI is most important to me, as it is what I spend.

The forecast across the board for January is upward... except maybe for the PPI. It's hard to imagine consumer spending slipping, inventories jumping and orders lagging... resulting in anything other than a deceleration of the PPI. But the experts seem to think May is when things will start to decelerate for all the above. In fact the PPI is forecast to reverse in May, back to 5 months ago range, which will somewhat stagnate the monthly CPI... not a reversal.  

BUT... a bit of history. Last year, there was consensus on helicopter money directly to the masses. Our leaders wanted it to jump start the economy and the FED said do it, we've got your back. The the term transitory became a popular word... until it was decided it might no longer be applicable to the current situation. 

So the FED is fixing to do something and the knives are out. Who knows what will happen?

Unfortunately for a lot of Americans on fixed income, it will not help, as the die is already cast. A fixed income limits any increases in spending and reduces the amount purchased. The alternative would be adding debt, which would now be costlier, if the rates are raised. It is a never ending cycle, imo.

Enough of the depressing news. I'll go watch some YouTube comedians or take a nap... or both.

Friday, October 8, 2021

Saving Social Security and Changing C.O.L.A.

 

via GIPHY

I have been reading about attempts to save Social Security of which I partake. Does Social Security need saving?

The short answer is no, as social security will not come to an end in 2033/34. Think of the S.S. trust as a bank account. You put money into the bank and the bank uses it to make loans, which is how the bank can afford to pay interest into your account. That is the basic foundation of S.S. from the beginning in 1935.

The issue is... your expenses are now exceeding the amount you are putting into that bank account as well as the interest being paid to that account by the bank.

At some point in 2033/34, the amount being withdrawn cannot exceed the deposits, which results in something like 80% of withdrawals compared to previous.

The ideas being put forth, while ignoring the likelihood of congress doing anything...

A. Raise the eligibility ages. Considering the longevity of the average American is now older... probably an good idea, but not a complete resolution. 

B. Remove the cap on taxable earnings or raise it substantially. Probably the best solution across the board and can take various forms to alleviate the issue going forward. Whether deducting only from the worker and continuing cap on employers, etc.

C. Change the method for calculating increases. This runs into changing from current Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W) to either Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U, which is current headline used) or Chained Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (C-CPI-U) or Research CPI Experimental for Americans age 62 years of age and older (R-CPI-E). 

As an elder, I can narrow down the choice fairly quickly, based on which would have benefited me. The current method of CPI-W had fairly consistently moved with CPI-U and outpaced C-CPI-U on a historical basis. It does strike me as odd that the current CPI-W year over year is outpacing those two by a large margin. 

Historically, the following is based on typical rank of inflation (from highest inflation to lowest, based on August BLS release)...

  • R-CPI-E (100=1982; current 297.114 (217.8=2007, 36.42% increase since 2007)
  • CPI-W (100=1982; current 268.387)(205.777=2007, 30.42% increase since 2007)
  • CPI-U (100=1982; current 273.567 (210.236=2007, 30.12% increase since 2007)
  • C-CPI-U (121.295=2007: current 153.715) (26.73% increase since 2007)

    Based on data from August BLS release...

    • CPI-W (5.8%)
    • CPI-U (5.3%)
    • C-CPI-U (5.1%)
    • R-CPI-E (4.8%)
    So obviously for the long haul, I would have preferred the R-CPI-E, based on the above, but... since December 2016 until July 2021, the changes have been this by rank... (did not update to August numbers.)
    • CPI-W: 13.8%
    • CPI-U: 13.1%
    • R-CPI-E: 12.86%
    • C-CPI-U: 11.68%
    Clearly something has changed since 2016 and the near term data favors the CPI-W. 

    Until something better comes along, the CPI-W remains the best option as the E in R-CPI-E stands for experimental. Not sure why so many on the left are pushing the R-CPI-E. I understand the right's fascination with C-CPI-U.

    The answer to the Social Security dilemma is a combination of A and B. While it is a fun task for me to opinionize about the matter, it still falls to a future congress to actually do something.

    Congress does not move on major projects unless pushed into a corner. My guess would be about 10 years from now... that corner will come into view. Truly, I do hope to be around to see that take place.



    Review of March 2024 data, 1Q GDP, PCE and personal income

    The monthly summary is not so wonderful, incomparison... Inside all that pink is some troubling food related issues. Even though energy is s...