The latest petroleum inventories (Sep-02-2026)

A mixed bag, with crude falling, as well as gasoline, jet fuel and SPR. Distillate edged up, as well as Jet fuel. 

Gasoline consumption is edging downward on a 4 week moving average. -2.8% compared to year ago levels, and -0.5% on the week to week 4 week average.

Pump prices for gasoline are staying in a somewhat narrow band. However diesel prices could very well break through all time highs, set in June of 2022. $6+ for a national average is certainly within the realm of possibility, with California diesel possibly topping $8 in the near future. 

So some fun facts. The U.S. consumer uses about 1/3 of global gasoline consumption, while the U.S. refiners produce about 1/6 of global diesel product, after export the U.S. consumes... about 12% of global diesel products. 

U.S. refiners are operating at near record levels, to meet the demand. The global demand of diesel... is driving the price upward, at an astonishing pace. Despite refining about half as much diesel, as gasoline, the refiners are making 70% more on that diesel. 

One would think the refiners might wish to make even more, by tweaking the process to produce more diesel. While that is theoretically possible, it would also cause gasoline stocks to slip, thereby driving up gasoline pump prices, which is more politically visible. 

So while there is a bit of stability in gasoline prices, the diesel market will be allowed to escalate prices until, it becomes politically visible. However the majority of the public will focus on the pump price directly in their face and a minority will possibly virtue signal their indigation of diesel prices.

What I am saying is... diesel prices are set to rise another 82¢ a gallon from today's price, while gasoline will likely stay in their current range.

Feel free to bookmark and come back in a few weeks, to see how accurate I am, or point out my inaccuracies. 

Just when will the debt overwhelm the system?

Current national debt...

A brief history (simplified)...

We went off the so called gold standard in the 60s and early 70s. We began trading in dollar assets. We imported a bit more than we exported in the 70s, largely due to oil imports. The dollar fell in value, which prompted the circulation of more dollars and thereby inflation. 

That led to the so called eurobonds (not to be confused with Euro Bonds). In this case the eurobonds were principally in deutschmarks, meaning the debt was to be repaid in deutschmarks, regardless of the trading value with the dollar... which was weakening against these eurobonds.

Famously, Paul Volcker dramatically raised interest rates, which propelled bond yields upward, with the resultant demand in dollar based debt instruments.

The era of the strong dollar, increased purchasing power for imported goods, which escalated. Normally, the profits from these imported goods, would have been repatriated to the exporting country currency, keeping the dollar vs foreign currency rather stable. 

However creative ways and methods, including opening up U.S. companies, property, etc. to foreign entities. Of course, the early and easiest route was strong demand for U.S. debt. This continued until the early 2000s, when more and more U.S. property became the target and the attraction to Treasury debt became relatively stable. The dollar remained strong, as competing countries currencies weakened. 

It became a necessity for everyone, to keep the dollar strong, as any weakening threatened the value of dollarized assets. 

The graph above, indicates the timing of the various "QE" programs. The FED was basically absorbing the debt at the primary dealer market to keep interest rates low and inflation at bay. 

When the "trust" hits zero, a hole of $300B~$400B will need to be somehow covered. Congress would need to authorize that additional expenditure.

Where will it come from?

1. Additional debt creation, requiring ever increasing interest rates. Who will purchase that debt and at what premium, that will likely be spiraling upward?
2. Could the FED enact a never before seen size of QE, in attempts to keep interest rates at bay?
3. Will congress finally be forced to massively cutting spending?

As for #1: There is no willpower in Congress, now, in the near future, or even when staring at the abyss... to reduce spending and limit further debt creation. We'll be have gone over the fiscal cliff, before such cuts are forced, via eurobonds, extreme interest rates and massive weakening of the dollar, of which would happen rapidly and dollar holdings will get dumped, as everyone is heading for the exits. 

As for #2: The FED in theory could enact a massive QE program, but it would require fiscal restraint by Congress. Remember that an unrestrained fiscal spending outlook, couple with a massive QE would eventually lead to undermining the entire financial system, which leads to same result as outlined in #1.

As for #3: Probably, once it is too late and public is clamoring for massive change. 

All of that is extreme, but the "Trust" will be bust in 4th quarter of 2032, per the latest estimate. There is also a national election during that 4th quarter, as well. 

If it goes bust, which I have spent most of this article predicting... an immediate and huge impact will hit the economy. Seniors that rely soley on S.S. trust fund income, will be in need of many of the other government programs, which will simply move the debt into those areas. Those that do not soley rely on the trust fund, will likely cut back on spending. 

In the interim, goods and services will take a hit and industries will need to reduce spending (manpower) to bridge gap. Additionally, they may require loans to cover expenses, while the various product pipelines reduce inventories to a new reality. Just as the government is driving up interest rates on their bonds, notes, bills, etc. This is not just a U.S. debt problem, as the sum total of debt worldwide is increasing at a rapid rate.

If you think none of this can happen, just remember... we were here before, when everything was tiny, compared to today, and when there was a willingness to address the problems.

I would suspect that 2033 will be the year of reckoning, although significant cracks will be observed in the runup to that period.

Does the WNBA really have a problem?

Depends on what the WNBA is hoping to achieve. Certainly ticket sales increased for games Clark appeared in, yet the hysteria extends far beyond that phenomena... as of now. My guess is even bad press is good for ticket sales. Interest for whatever reason is at an all time high.

I suspect a lot of incidences are being blown out of proportion to keep the WNBA in the news and further promote interest... and thereby ticket sales and viewership.

Now whether that is the intended aim of the WNBA, remains to be seen, but I doubt they are really trying hard not to squelch the flow of money. 

So while some of the solutions to the WNBA's problems might seem straight forward, it would also rock the boat on the flow of money.

Whether the level of NBA play and WNBA play can be debated as being equal... the greed is certainly equal, imo

The quandry the WNBA has, is related to the flow of money and how to continue and capitalize on the current influx of attention. 

via GIPHY

An update on July's inflation numbers with a look at C.O.L.A, and future of that Trust Fund

First off the July numbers...

The worrying part, is the Producer Price, which could be indicative of future pressure on retail prices.

Which briefly mention CPI-W, which is used for COLA. 

My current estimate is 3.4%-3.5%. Oddly, there seems to be a lot of grousing about this should be higher, or the data is manipulated, etc. What makes it odd, is there are some that inadvertently are wishing for higher inflation, so they get a higher increase. Given the lag time, this is rather insane. 

Of course, this inevitably leads to changing the way it is calculated. Typically, the CPI-E becomes part of that discussion. It would still be lagging, much the same way as CPI-W, although slightly higher... historically. 

The the subject morphs into the "trust" fund. There seems to be a majority opinion that something will be done, to defer that ±22% cut in a few years.

Which brings up the next question... can anyone really do anything. Frankly, I doubt that happening. Why you might ask.

There are 3 types of treasuries. Bills, Notes and Bonds.

Notes and bonds are paid the coupon interest, every 6 months. If a $100 note or bond is issued with a coupon rate of 4%, then two dollars is paid out every 6 months. The coupon rate is set on the primary dealer market. The yields we commonly see published is from the secondary market. Hence if a 5% yield is published, then then value of that note or bond has fallen below $100, when traded. It thereby indicates that future coupon rates will be higher. 

What is paid out on Notes and Bonds... goes agains the budget deficit. This added burden in debt service, will not likely ease... when those 100s of billions of dollars are added to keep social security at 100%.

Now the discussion turns to Bills, which are not paid interest, but rather more of a fee. The treasury sells a $100 treasury Bill for $98, with the guarantee of paying back $100 in 6 months. They pay they $100 by selling a $100 treasurt bill with a guarantee of paying back $102+ in 6 months. That cycle repeats.

The Notes and Bonds interest... shows up on the annual fiscal deficits. The Bills do not. The treasury bills get added to the National Debt. The national debt is rising at a faster nominal rate than the annual deficits, due to this accounting practice.

There is currenly over $8 trillion dollars of notes, with the number rising at a rapid rate. 

We are on a timeline where investors will require much higher premiums to finance these debt instruments. 

What I think will likely happen and the timeline... might be published at a later date.

Another week with the crude report from EIA.GOV.

Let's get the inventory numbers out of the way...

There is some y/y decline in the 4 week average of consumption...

Pump prices are somewhat steady on the gasoline side, although edging up on the diesel side. 

The prices still haven't broken through the 2022 highs and would have a long way to go in inflation adjusted dollars. The inflation adjusted figures are even more startling for 2008.

There is an old saying that we should learn from our mistakes. But are we able to learn from our mistakes, if we constantly blame others???

Should I Start Posting Again... or Not!

It has been awhile, although I have kept abreast of a few things.

First up... is inventory status of select energy components in the USA.

The SPR status is slowly declining, with the unknown being how much spoilage is there. At current rates of withdrawal, about 50 weeks remain... IF there is no spoilage. The Cushing inventory, which is included in the Crude numbers... is low, but not critical, given historical number. 

Of course, the BIG story is pump prices of gasoline. 

I would be a bit more concerned with the Diesel prices, but hey...

Gasoline consumption is -1.7% from last year, with it being -0.4% from last week. Whatever the price, the consumer seems to be adjusting, although still complaining. 

Looking forward, and based on current market pricing...

An uptick in gasoline is in the offing, but the diesel is set to rise rather swiftly, imo.

That finishes up this episode of an old guy foolishly expressing his opinion.

Some thought on May 7th, 2026... about energy, etc.

It's been awhile since posting, although I never really stopped tracking. 

Current U.S. inventories, compared to last week and 1 year ago.

Not terribly tight and I really don't see a significant drop off in U.S. consumer purchasing at the pump. Distillate exports reached an all time high during this reporting period. Additionally, the distillate inventory has dropped to levels not seen since 5/23/2003.

Pump prices compared to days gone by, factoring in inflation...

That $4.114 in July, 2008 is comparable to $6.176 in today's dollars. Also, the $5.016 of June, 2022 is comparable to $5.590 in today's dollars.

The market does seem to be settling down a bit, but I suspect that is more fear of getting caught over bought, due to some very clear demand destruction in Asia. Much was made if that 470M Barrels being released from various strategic petroleum reserves, but that is a drop in the bucket to the near 1B barrels that have been lost to the strait of hormuz blockade, etc.

Even if the blockade suddenly stopped tomorrow and the full complement of crude starts tomorrow... another 500M barrels will be removed from the global inventories, due to transit times of delivey. If you are keeping track... that is 1B barrels above the SPR release.

That demand destruction is taking place, is undeniable. Even with significant demand destruction of 5M barrels per day... it would take 6 months for a full recovery, imho.

What I find interesting, is the lack of discussion of the current state of natural gas supplies. Qatar suffered a severe setback in its LNG liquefaction facilities. It will take some time to resolve that situation and while there are new Liquefaction facilities coming on line later this year... the current state of the European Union's Natural Gas storage if behind last year, with draws still above last year. 

Purchases of Natural Gas for storage is woefully behind last year. Perhaps they see a milder winter coming up over the next 12 months. I guess what I am hinting at... Natural Gas prices in Europe are set to dramatically escalate in the coming months, OR... they may decide to swallow some pride and get some of that pipeline natural gas from somewhere.