Another Look at C.O.L.A.

 

Click to Enlarge

Back in August I stated... somewhere between 8.6% ~ 9.0%. Clearly, a revision has taken place. Largely due to the continued drop in gasoline. 

If you remember the July CPI report, it stated the -7.7% gasoline number held off all the price increases in everything else. August is over and I am betting the August CPI will be -10% for gasoline. 

Of course, the C.O.L.A. is based on CPI-W, which slipped -0.1% in July and was 9.1% over the year.  -10% in gasoline would in theory... create an even lower number than -0.1%. Granted, the other stuff may be accelerating inflation wise, but I am not so sure about that. 

In any case, I suspect the CPI-W will be in the range as noted and the monthly change will be -0.3%~0.5%.

That would be stellar, except it is only gasoline and many other things like food, electricity, and heating bills are rising... going into that time of year. A lump of coal might be a welcome gift, come Christmas. (Hey, everything else has gone topsy turvy... why not?)

For the record, the C.O.L.A. announced in fall 1981 for 1982 year was 11.4%. The fall of 1982 announcement for year 1983 was 7.4%. This year's announcement should be between those two numbers.

And for the first time in a long while, there should not be much of an increase in Medicare B premiums. Mostly because we were over charged last year, but still, taking them at their word of that drug being half of last year's rise, and then they found out that drug was half the original price... we end up back to where we currently are for next year. That $60 we got over charged this year will be metered back to us this coming year. 

Am I Over Thinking?

 

Just when I think I have figured something out... it goes "poof"!

A bit over a week ago, the price of natural gas in Europe and U.K. went skyward, Mostly because Gazprom was shutting down Nord Stream 1 for repairs and might not reopen. 

On the 26th of August, Norway's Gassco, stated they will reduce capacity for planned and unplanned maintenance at 13 fields and processing plants throughout September.

This past week saw prices drop 30%. Reasons given...

1. It was thought Nord Stream 1 would reopen on schedule.
2. Germany was a month ahead of meeting its storage capacity targets.
3. It was suggested that certain large industrial users of natural gas could not afford the high price and were shutting down.
4. It was further suggested, these companies were selling some of that much cheaper natural gas "forward contracted" a couple of years back... for a healthy profit margin going forward. 

Then late Friday, Gazprom said no on reopening on schedule, just like everyone originally thought. 

So #1 was wrong, #2 is probably right. How can #2 continue on pace to achieve all its targets, if Nord Stream 1 remains shuttered and Norway starts their planned and unplanned maintenance? Unless there is much to #3 and #4.

Let's face it... if you were a company that heavily uses natural gas; you would want to plan several years ahead and lock in prices. Say it is mid 2019 and you lock in a 10€ per MWh and you have that currently locked into your business model, but your business model suggests a dramatic slowdown in your sales... you could look back at that 10€ per MWh and see the market is currently paying 20 times that rate. 

Call me quite cynical, but when such a company screams they cannot afford such high natural gas prices and then shut down, I wonder what the real motivation might be. 

This becomes especially true, when considering some of these countries are multi-national conglomerates.

Am I over thinking?

Where do we stand on Natural Gas and European Inflation.

Are we looking at the wrong stats to determine whether we will have a recession in the U.S.? Slowly, concern for China's economy has edged into the picture, but not much is being said about Europe. 

Frankly, I don't see how Europe can avoid a recession and I wonder how that will impact the U.S. It is clear for all to see, the impact of natural gas will have on Europe. These aren't small numbers.

When you hear reports of the U.K. raising the cap to £4,200 annual, it might be overlooked that in early summer of last year... it was about £1,200 annual. Currently the cap is about £2,000 annual. Here is the latest futures, converted to USD...

click to enlarge

Inflation in Europe is edging up, even while the governments are trying to keep a lid on the natural gas impact to consumers. 

click to enlarge

Maybe a chart would be better...

click to enlarge

Generally speaking and from I can glean... the German natural gas storage is 78% of capacity, with a goal of 90%... just to get through this winter and then the cycle continues. The U.K. is near capacity and is using its LNG facilities to export to Europe. As winter nears the expectation is for U.K. prices to soar to that £4,200 annual.

Considering that not long ago, Asia was the recipient of one half of LNG. They are being subjected to very high LNG prices as well.

The U.S. is not immune to upward natural gas prices, but not to the extent of Europe. The recent CPI report seems to have somewhat mirrored the ebb and flow of Nat/Gas prices, but the ebb may be over, as the flow via LNG, is set to restart with Freeport and where there is money to be made... more facilities will come on line. Drawing against U.S. reserves. 

It was Freeport going off line, which created the dip, as the draw on reserves slowed.

click to enlarge
https://www.eia.gov/naturalgas/weekly/#tabs-prices-3

While this chart indicates some slipping in July, due to Freeport being offline, the current NatGas price is about $9 and expected to continue climbing as LNG exports pick up. While Freeport is not slated to come back on line until an October restart... the draw has begun.

Month to Month
click to enlarge

That July drop will reverse in August.

And it should not go unnoticed... electricity prices have been on a steady upward swing, which with about 40% of our electricity coming from natural gas generation. Winter is nigh upon us. Gasoline may be ebbing (?), but the rest of the overlooked energy index is not, and it will likely be overlooked until those heating bills come into play.

We have gotten rather used to cheap natural gas and those days are in the rear view mirror, imo. So what are natural gas stocks for the U.S. compared to last year.

click to enlarge
https://www.eia.gov/naturalgas/weekly/

3375Bcf last year to 2519Bcf this year, or down 25.3%. Certainly within the 5 year average, but only 119Bcf above the minimum.

Let's hope for a very mild winter.

Would Keystone XL Have Helped?

That seems to be all the rage, now with gasoline prices topping the US $5 mark. It seems that everyone can agree, that it is the fault of one political party or the other. So it would seem that allowing the Keystone XL pipeline to be built... would have increased the volume of crude coming into the United States and thereby reduce the price of gasoline.

Except we are exporting crude and petroleum products at an enormous and historical rate. We have exported 920,255,000 barrels of oil and petroleum products since the beginning of March. Certainly we have imported a lot as well. 827,071,000 barrels of oil and petroleum products in that same period. Oh wait... that export number is nearly 100 million barrels higher than the import number.

What would the crude inventory look like... Note the gray area is the 5 year range, both top and bottom, with the blue line being where we actually are and the red line being those 100 million barrels. Note the 5 year is distorted by the sudden drop in consumer demand, due to covid, which would normally be in the 420 million barrel range. Even the past 5 years is distorted in comparison to 7 years ago. (If you struggle with the small print, just click on the image. 

It gets even better as we have exported 86,667,000 barrels of gasoline over that same period, while importing 74,508,000 barrels of gasoline. Oops!

This is why I am having a problem with the idea surrounding the failure to approve Keystone XL as having an impact on our current gasoline prices. 

To be sure, IF we could go back in time and retroactively approve Keystone XL it should reduce the global impact of crude and thereby the price of gasoline, IF everything else remained the same.

To do that, we would need to ignore the shale boom (drill baby drill) and our own Congress in December, 2015, lifted the oil export ban that had been in place for over 40 years and let's not forget the releases of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR).

Briefly, the Keystone XL was proposed back in 2008, just as U.S. gasoline prices roared past the $4 per gallon mark. Keystone XL was a proposal by what was then called Trans Canada, based in Calgary. It was the 4th phase of the project, which came under fire. Politics in Canada prevents pipelines of this scale from going to their coasts, thus it is almost captive to the U.S. Market. 

It should be noted that XL was struck down in November, 2015.

Here is the gasoline price chart, with some embedded notes from me. (Pardon the penmanship)

Here is the U.S. Production chart without my adding comments, so refer to above dates and times... (Note that dates may not line up and I probably should have marked each)

So while we can blame Obama (Democrat) for the Keystone cancellation, it should be pointed out the repeal of the crude oil export ban... was Republican led. So here is what transpired, regarding exports from the USA.

Then finally, the last part of the picture... crude oil historical inventory.

At that point in time, the drill baby drill people were under severe financial stress and really needed to unload crude via exports. Keystone XL would have added pressure as well, although the XL stood for export limited, which seems like the exports would be limited, but in American terms, Keystone XL (export limited) would have been branded Keystone XI (export inc.) Keystone was a Canadian venture. Granted it was being exported to the USA, but intent was points further. 

And it was clear the aim was to link up to Cushing Oklahoma and the new pipelines being put in place to the gulf coast AND thereby be further exported to parts unknown. Pipelines that had moved crude from the gulf to the interior were being reversed, as part of this plan. Yes, the refiners in the Gulf had established Foreign Trade Zone status, thereby exempting the Canadian crude from export ban. It was a pass through arrangement being planned.

Keystone XL was slated to add 850,000 barrels per day into the mix. Yes, it would have theoretically lowered global petroleum prices, but so would the release of 1,000,000 barrels a day from the SPR. Coupled together, the likelihood was prices being about the same as current, as the need to phase out Russian Crude would be pulled forward.

Just because XL was struck down, does not mean their crude is not making its way to the gulf and the U.S. refineries along the gulf. Remember all the problems with rail tanker explosions and fires? The result was new tanker requirements and the biggest makers of these new tankers were subsidiaries of Burlington Northern, which was owned by Berkshire Hathaway. A lot of money to be made by building these new rail tankers and hauling this crude. It would have been cheaper by pipeline, but politics is politics.

Striking down XL doesn't appear to have staunched the flow of crude oil from Canada...

Then there is this... 

CALGARY, Alberta, March 24 (Reuters) - Canada has capacity to increase oil and gas exports by up to 300,000 barrels per day (bpd) by the end of 2022 to help improve global energy security following Russia's invasion of Ukraine, Natural Resources Minister Jonathan Wilkinson on Thursday.

It would seem that existing flows were not at capacity, so how would XL have increased the flows?

I can't really see a way around the current price of gasoline at the pump. We may have seen prices lower than 1 year ago and may see prices come down quicker in the fall... but right now, it would likely be the same. 

As usual, there is plenty of blame to pass around and nothing will really be done to alleviate the rise in prices. 

Would Keystone XL have helped? ONLY IF  YOU BELIEVE NONE OF IT WOULD BE EXPORTED OR DISPLACE U.S. CRUDE TO BE EXPORTED. By the way, I have this beachfront property for sale in Death Valley... if you are interested.

If you feel the need to blame politicians, be sure to blame ALL, in my humble opinion. The finger prints of each party are all over the current situation. 

Weather or Not! Why Not!

3 times this past week, the notion of a tropical storm or hurricane has popped up on a certain weather forecasting model. It was the only model to indicate this potential and subsequent models did not reflect any such movements.

For the record this one and only model indicated a storm likely moving across the Florida panhandle on the 24th. A day later... nothing. A couple of days later, the indication was a storm likely moving over New Orleans on the 29th. Then nothing. Today it shows a strong disturbance just south of Cuba. Tomorrow will likely show nothing. Only one model has shown anything... all others nothing.

I am NOT forecasting a hurricane or a tropical storm in the near future... or even one at all. My point is about how 50% of the USA petroleum refining capacity is along the Gulf Coast, as well as LNG terminals.

Current inventories of crude and the various petroleum products are below the seasonal range of normal inventory. A gander at the weekly report from the EIA.gov quickly indicates the dilemma we are in. To clarify what below the seasonal range actually means... lowest of the past 5 years, based on this time of year.

We've had massive storms in the past, but were able to weather the storm, due to sufficient inventories. It would not take much of a storm to skyrocket prices from current levels. The potential for a tropical storm along the Gulf Coast, is not an unreasonable forecast for sometime this summer. 

That is my point, weather you like it or not. 

Odd and interesting things found on the internet.

My reading list needs to be trimmed...

One website had a thread complaining about what to do with a narcissist. There were multiple people weighing in with advice... (narcissists?)

Clearly some threads are simply a mundane idea that has popped into someone's head. (Narcissism?)

Multiple threads purporting to be about facts, that degenerate into myths and urban legends. Is it intentional?

In that same theme... Quotes of the day, which should be relabeled as MIS-quotes of the day.

Some folks, apparently, prefer to ask questions on social media about their medications, which could be obtained by reading the literature that is already available. Reading is reading... smh!

Ran across a piece regarding Fruitcakes! No, not us internet denizens but rather the actual fruitcake... The magnificent history of the maligned and misunderstood fruitcake. For me it was a fun read and not my usual material. But education comes in all forms. 

A few thoughts on Omicron. It was first detected in South Africa, where several cases were among 35~39 years of age and the symptoms were mild. Sounds good, but I wondered about some of the other statements. 

While South Africa has a poor vaccination rate, the general belief is the rest of the population has probably had covid. Which led me to wonder why their death rate was ranked 55th in the world. Turns out they have an average age of 27 and only 5.5% of the population is above 60, which seem to be the prime age group for severe cases and deaths. When adjusting the death rate to the USA's 16.5% of population in that age group... the ranking might be closer to #2, just behind Peru.

There is also the matter of cases being "mild" among that 35~39-year-old age group already infected. What is mild? Would the older age groups also be mild? IF South Africa is either vaccinated or had covid, then Omicron can overcome the vaccine and/or immunity from previous infection. 

A lot more questions, than answers at this point. In any case, I am certainly maintaining the hermit lifestyle I have adopted. I do wonder about the almost guaranteed potential wave of cases upon the working folks and how that might impact industry output, etc. 

Even with hermit lifestyle, I cannot avoid such impacts and need to prepare quickly... on top of might current preparations. 

And yes, I will likely pay more as inflation is going to continue the upward trend. I lot of folks are saying this and that about the FED, and the Fed has been banging the drums. Yet the FED has done nothing and clearly is waiting on inflation to taper, prior to doing anything meaningful, imo. Also in my opinion, the FED is at least 6 months behind on tightening and possibly 9+ months. Tightening should be done when growth is heating up, not when it begins to slow, and I think that will likely start at the first of the year. 

I might be wrong and certainly hope I am, but it seems the "good" news has to be viewed as suspect, much like the "bad" news. 

Finally, there is the "logic" being used. According to one internet sleuth, "we have tried masking, vaccinations, shutdowns, and social distancing... and none of it has worked, so anyone with basic logic skills should recognize none of it is working and should be ignored." 

It is sad that something akin to this is passed of as a logical deduction! It's a sad world that accepts this type of irrational thinking.

We have tried to get people to mask universally, but with limited success and strong resistance; we have tried to fully vaccinate people, but with very limited success; We have tried shutdowns in some areas, but only for short periods and thus with very limited success; and finally... social distancing was never really practiced in most places. So, to form some logical conclusion from any of this is rather idiotic. 

But we see evidence every day, as to how irrational the world has become. That is the sad reality.