Today's EIA.gov report.
Crude stocks up again, +1.1M barrels, from last week; Distillates slid -3.3M Barrels; and Gasoline slid -6.0M barrels.
Click on image to enlarge |
Today's EIA.gov report.
Crude stocks up again, +1.1M barrels, from last week; Distillates slid -3.3M Barrels; and Gasoline slid -6.0M barrels.
Click on image to enlarge |
In a much to early review of the 2024 election, I provide my totally uneducated, possibly biased, sarcastic, and pragmatic predictions.
Listed below are the potential candidates for each parties nomination, according to a variety of sources.
I have them listed in reverse order of age, which is age on January 20, 2025, as well as end of 2nd term.
I'll start with the democrats, and quickly eliminate some. An example would be Michelle Obama, as she has very much made it clear... she is not interested. When I look down the list, I quickly realize some of these names have some traction, but not enough to unseat Biden, imho.
The intrigue within the democrat ranks, would be the VP choice. Replacing Harris might be considered, but is fraught with peril, regarding demographics. I'll be frank... someone that is not old, not male, and not white. That only leaves a couple of choices... so it will be Harris, imho.
DEMOCRATS...
The actual fun, going into 2024, would be the republican race. Trump clouds up everything for the republicans. For all the talk of someone else, at this point, that does not seem likely. Whether you love him or hate him, he is likely the nominee.
The VP choice, is filled with intrigue. There are many that would not make the grade, for a variety of reasons. With the biggest reason, being Trump himself. You would also have to consider 2028, and who might wish to avoid the VP position in 2024, and focus on that 2028 election.
It matters, as in my lifetime...
Then you have the potential candidates for V.P., although Pence seemingly came from nowhere and likely based on donor connections. Then there is the toxic relations with many of the other candidates on this list. Seriously, can you imagine Liz Cheney as a Trump V.P. nominee?
Then there is the potential benefit to the ticket. Most are in republican safe states. Could Youngkin deliver Virginia's 13 electoral votes to the Republicans? Would he influence any other states?
So the V.P. nominee is a crap shoot, imho.
REPUBLICANS...
Click image to enlarge |
The Energy Information Administration released their weekly report Thursday.
Click image to enlarge |
Of course, it varies by region...
Click image to enlarge |
The price at Sumas on the Canada-Washington border, the main pricing point in the Pacific Northwest, fell $3.74 from $7.16/MMBtu last Wednesday to $3.42/MMBtu yesterday.
The price at Malin, Oregon, the northern delivery point into the PG&E service territory, fell $1.48 from $7.52/MMBtu last Wednesday to $6.04/MMBtu yesterday, leading to a $1.86/MMBtu decline in the price at the PG&E Citygate in Northern California from $8.80/MMBtu last Wednesday to $6.94/MMBtu yesterday.
So the U.S. is starting to look good. HOWEVER, storage contains natural gas that was priced at much higher rates. While most futures are substantially down, that higher priced NatGas in storage will prop up energy prices to the consumer. They should trend downward from here. How long that takes... I don't know.
The same situation is seen in UK and EU. However prices are still elevated and will likely remain elevated. There should be some easing to the consumer, but not sure that will happen this year.
Click image to enlarge |
Gasoline prices were (per AAA) were up 2¢ this week, to $3.466. A year ago, the price had ballooned to $4.316.
The seasonal consumption is slipping a bit. (This is a four week moving average). It is -0.8% below one year ago levels. However, the national average pump price is -20.2% below same period.
Click image to enlarge |
Today's EIA.gov report.
Crude stocks up again, +1.5M barrels, from last week; Distillates slid -2.5M Barrels; and Gasoline slid -2.0M barrels.
Click image to enlarge |
ADVANCE MONTHLY SALES FOR RETAIL AND FOOD SERVICES, February 2023
Advance estimates of U.S. retail and food services sales for February 2023, adjusted for seasonal variation and holiday and trading-day differences, but not for price changes, were $697.9 billion, down 0.4 percent (±0.5 percent)* from the previous month, but up 5.4 percent (±0.7 percent) above February 2022. Total sales for the December 2022 through February 2023 period were up 6.4 percent (±0.4 percent) from the same period a year ago. The December 2022 to January 2023 percent change was revised from up 3.0 percent (±0.5 percent) to up 3.2 percent (±0.3 percent).
Retail trade sales were down 0.1 percent (±0.5 percent)* from January 2023, but up 4.0 percent (±0.7 percent) above last year. Food services and drinking places were up 15.3 percent (±2.6 percent) from February 2022, while general merchandise stores were up 10.5 percent (±0.2 percent) from last year.
The data is not inflation adjusted. The data in this graph is...
Click image to enlarge |
but up 5.4 percent (±0.7 percent) above February 2022.
Again, that is before inflation is taken in consideration. The CPI-U, was 6.0%.
For the month to month, with inflation adjustments...
Click image to enlarge |
Click image to enlarge |
The BLS has released the February Producer Price Index Report. (historical releases)
The Producer Price Index for Final Demand decreased 0.1 percent in February, seasonally adjusted, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Final demand prices advanced 0.3 percent in January and declined 0.2 percent in December 2022. (See table A.) On an unadjusted basis, the final demand index rose 4.6 percent for the 12 months ended in February.
In February, the decline in the final demand index was led by prices for final demand goods, which fell 0.2 percent. The index for final demand services edged down 0.1 percent.
The index for final demand less foods, energy, and trade services increased 0.2 percent in February after rising 0.5 percent in January. For the 12 months ended in February, prices for final demand less foods, energy, and trade services advanced 4.4 percent.
Final demand goods: The index for final demand goods fell 0.2 percent in February following a 1.2-percent advance in January. A 2.2-percent decline in prices for final demand foods was a major factor in the February decrease. The index for final demand energy moved down 0.2 percent. In contrast, prices for final demand goods less foods and energy rose 0.3 percent.
Click image to enlarge |
Okay, so let me blow my horn a bit, with last month's prediction...
Next month is likely to surprise to the low side, possibly even a monthly negative, with annual at the +4.4% range.
Okay, got that out of the way. All in all a good report, with many areas of hope. Now on to the "Nonfood materials less energy." Which, I guess, is similar to core... being without food and energy. That popped +1.2% for the month, following January's +1.6%. I get this feeling it will be near +1.8%, when March's numbers come out.
Still, I would anticipate March to be year over year of +3.0%, and month to month being flat.
Laugh of the week Watching Sky News and a lady proclaimed that social media sites should be held to the same strict standards as newspaper p...