Energy Inventory Update, and Some Geo-Political Thoughts

I guess it is no surprise that pump prices are rapidly rising... now standing at 11.5% above year ago levels.

How high could it go? That gets very complicated and depends on...

Past crude oil disruptions

Nothing really compares to the current situation. The 1973 Arab Embargo, targeted the U.S. and a few other countries, which were mostly unaffected. Notably, the U.S. experienced shortages and significant price hikes. The 1980 Iranian revolution impacted the global prices, but not the Straits of Hormuz. Again this impacted the U.S. with spot shortages and sharp price rises. 

That latter crisis did result in our current spot pricing structure, which ensures inventory across the different regions of the country.

The duration of closure of the Straits of Hormuz.

This is the determinant of future crude prices, natural gas prices, etc. As these are global commodities, the U.S. is not immune, as a net exporter of crude and LNG.

The 2nd part of the puzzle is shipping costs, which are usually included in those futures pricing. There are a lot of tankers, fully loaded and sitting stationary in that Gulf. Additionally, tankers are starting to pile up at the entrance into the Gulf. All those tankers are basically removing shipping capacity from the equation. 

We can all remember the high prices at the pump in 2008, which was caused by a much weaker dollar AND limited transport capability, due to our extreme dependence on imports at that time. 

Some basic math. 

Currently about 20 million barrels of crude passes through the Straits of Hormuz, each every day. Of that, less than 1 million barrels is shipped to the U.S. 3 million barrels are from Iran and generally goes to China. That leaves 16 million barrels for the rest.

The bulk of U.S. Imports are from Canada, which is largely captive by their government policies and is therefore highly dependant on the U.S. importing their product.

Certainly U.S. exports can rise, but a dramatic uptick in shipping would be hard to achieve, imo. U.S. Pump prices will most certainly rise, dependant upon duration of Straits of Hormuz closure, but there should be no shortages at the pump for at least 3 months. That might not be the case in other countries. 

Other overlooked factors

Deducting the 3mbpd exported by Iran to China, there remains 17mbpd of crude not passing through the Straits of Hormuz. That is approximately $1.3B per day of lost revenue to the exporters in that area.

With no ships entering the Straits of Hormuz, countries that are heavily dependent on food imports will experience possible sharp rises in prices, as well as potential shortages.

Summary

As someone that drives very little, an extreme jump in pump prices can be absorbed. As natural gas is a factor in electricity prices, I would expect an uncomfortable jump in that. With diesel prices jumping faster than gasoline and reliance on transportation of products... it will increase things I use on a regular basis.

For me... inflation is the story, NOT shortages, unless it would be shortage of money.

Latest Energy Consumption Data and A Few Ponderings About "Other" stuff!

Pump prices remain relatively steady, with consumption jumping on the weekly basis, but nearly flat... year over year.

Now for the opinion stuff...

It is fascinating to watch the British News over Epstein, Mandelson, Andrew, etc. It was a shock when Andrew was taken into custody. Of course, it was noted on several occasions that the British Police are investigating this sex trafficking thing more thoroughly than in the US.

The possible charges against Andrew, are over government secrets, which came to light after the files release. While he may be assessed by multiple British police agencies over possible movement of underage girls, he has not been charged.

Simply put... Andrew got a lot of publicity over sharing of secret government financial records with Epstein, which violates UK laws and dates back to 2011.

As for Epstein, he served 13 months from June 2008 ~ July 2009... on work release. Which meant he only spent his evenings in a cell. 

As for Andrew, he was a trade envoy from 2001~ 2011. He resigned that position due to some issues with expenses and possible association with unsavory characters.

It is hard to believe the Crown was not aware of Andrew's illegal business dealings. Yet all remained quiet.

An oddity in UK law has the Monarchy immune to open records requests, for 99 years after death.

Taking that last sentence and reviewing the timeline of the past 15 years, the slow drip drip of accusations against Andrew, stripping of his titles and duties and then the timing of his removal from the Royal Lodge, just 2 weeks prior to this latest uproar... reeks of a conspiracy. 

It is not so unbelievable that the Royal Lodge was scrubbed clean and any questionable material, digital and otherwise, is now safely ensconced in some walled off partition, held by the monarchy. To remain there until 99 years after Andrew's demise.

Thus the only evidence is in the U.S. files which were simply reproductions from digital files. 

With the UK media now describing the King as being forthcoming and willing to work with the authorities as somehow being above reproach. The cycle is nearly complete. 

Of course, this is all just a conspiracy on my part... and could never possibly be true.