Does the WNBA really have a problem?

Depends on what the WNBA is hoping to achieve. Certainly ticket sales increased for games Clark appeared in, yet the hysteria extends far beyond that phenomena... as of now. My guess is even bad press is good for ticket sales. Interest for whatever reason is at an all time high.

I suspect a lot of incidences are being blown out of proportion to keep the WNBA in the news and further promote interest... and thereby ticket sales and viewership.

Now whether that is the intended aim of the WNBA, remains to be seen, but I doubt they are really trying hard not to squelch the flow of money. 

So while some of the solutions to the WNBA's problems might seem straight forward, it would also rock the boat on the flow of money.

Whether the level of NBA play and WNBA play can be debated as being equal... the greed is certainly equal, imo

The quandry the WNBA has, is related to the flow of money and how to continue and capitalize on the current influx of attention. 

via GIPHY

An update on July's inflation numbers with a look at C.O.L.A, and future of that Trust Fund

First off the July numbers...

The worrying part, is the Producer Price, which could be indicative of future pressure on retail prices.

Which briefly mention CPI-W, which is used for COLA. 

My current estimate is 3.4%-3.5%. Oddly, there seems to be a lot of grousing about this should be higher, or the data is manipulated, etc. What makes it odd, is there are some that inadvertently are wishing for higher inflation, so they get a higher increase. Given the lag time, this is rather insane. 

Of course, this inevitably leads to changing the way it is calculated. Typically, the CPI-E becomes part of that discussion. It would still be lagging, much the same way as CPI-W, although slightly higher... historically. 

The the subject morphs into the "trust" fund. There seems to be a majority opinion that something will be done, to defer that ±22% cut in a few years.

Which brings up the next question... can anyone really do anything. Frankly, I doubt that happening. Why you might ask.

There are 3 types of treasuries. Bills, Notes and Bonds.

Notes and bonds are paid the coupon interest, every 6 months. If a $100 note or bond is issued with a coupon rate of 4%, then two dollars is paid out every 6 months. The coupon rate is set on the primary dealer market. The yields we commonly see published is from the secondary market. Hence if a 5% yield is published, then then value of that note or bond has fallen below $100, when traded. It thereby indicates that future coupon rates will be higher. 

What is paid out on Notes and Bonds... goes agains the budget deficit. This added burden in debt service, will not likely ease... when those 100s of billions of dollars are added to keep social security at 100%.

Now the discussion turns to Bills, which are not paid interest, but rather more of a fee. The treasury sells a $100 treasury Bill for $98, with the guarantee of paying back $100 in 6 months. They pay they $100 by selling a $100 treasurt bill with a guarantee of paying back $102+ in 6 months. That cycle repeats.

The Notes and Bonds interest... shows up on the annual fiscal deficits. The Bills do not. The treasury bills get added to the National Debt. The national debt is rising at a faster nominal rate than the annual deficits, due to this accounting practice.

There is currenly over $8 trillion dollars of notes, with the number rising at a rapid rate. 

We are on a timeline where investors will require much higher premiums to finance these debt instruments. 

What I think will likely happen and the timeline... might be published at a later date.

Another week with the crude report from EIA.GOV.

Let's get the inventory numbers out of the way...

There is some y/y decline in the 4 week average of consumption...

Pump prices are somewhat steady on the gasoline side, although edging up on the diesel side. 

The prices still haven't broken through the 2022 highs and would have a long way to go in inflation adjusted dollars. The inflation adjusted figures are even more startling for 2008.

There is an old saying that we should learn from our mistakes. But are we able to learn from our mistakes, if we constantly blame others???

Should I Start Posting Again... or Not!

It has been awhile, although I have kept abreast of a few things.

First up... is inventory status of select energy components in the USA.

The SPR status is slowly declining, with the unknown being how much spoilage is there. At current rates of withdrawal, about 50 weeks remain... IF there is no spoilage. The Cushing inventory, which is included in the Crude numbers... is low, but not critical, given historical number. 

Of course, the BIG story is pump prices of gasoline. 

I would be a bit more concerned with the Diesel prices, but hey...

Gasoline consumption is -1.7% from last year, with it being -0.4% from last week. Whatever the price, the consumer seems to be adjusting, although still complaining. 

Looking forward, and based on current market pricing...

An uptick in gasoline is in the offing, but the diesel is set to rise rather swiftly, imo.

That finishes up this episode of an old guy foolishly expressing his opinion.

Some thought on May 7th, 2026... about energy, etc.

It's been awhile since posting, although I never really stopped tracking. 

Current U.S. inventories, compared to last week and 1 year ago.

Not terribly tight and I really don't see a significant drop off in U.S. consumer purchasing at the pump. Distillate exports reached an all time high during this reporting period. Additionally, the distillate inventory has dropped to levels not seen since 5/23/2003.

Pump prices compared to days gone by, factoring in inflation...

That $4.114 in July, 2008 is comparable to $6.176 in today's dollars. Also, the $5.016 of June, 2022 is comparable to $5.590 in today's dollars.

The market does seem to be settling down a bit, but I suspect that is more fear of getting caught over bought, due to some very clear demand destruction in Asia. Much was made if that 470M Barrels being released from various strategic petroleum reserves, but that is a drop in the bucket to the near 1B barrels that have been lost to the strait of hormuz blockade, etc.

Even if the blockade suddenly stopped tomorrow and the full complement of crude starts tomorrow... another 500M barrels will be removed from the global inventories, due to transit times of delivey. If you are keeping track... that is 1B barrels above the SPR release.

That demand destruction is taking place, is undeniable. Even with significant demand destruction of 5M barrels per day... it would take 6 months for a full recovery, imho.

What I find interesting, is the lack of discussion of the current state of natural gas supplies. Qatar suffered a severe setback in its LNG liquefaction facilities. It will take some time to resolve that situation and while there are new Liquefaction facilities coming on line later this year... the current state of the European Union's Natural Gas storage if behind last year, with draws still above last year. 

Purchases of Natural Gas for storage is woefully behind last year. Perhaps they see a milder winter coming up over the next 12 months. I guess what I am hinting at... Natural Gas prices in Europe are set to dramatically escalate in the coming months, OR... they may decide to swallow some pride and get some of that pipeline natural gas from somewhere.

A FEW RAMBLINGS AND OPINIONS REGARDING INFLATION, ENERGY, ETC.

The PCE numbers for January finally arrived yesterday, so the January numbers...

Nothing to extreme. I recognize much of February reportage has been completed, so the laggard is the PCE, which will see next release around April 9th.

Obviously the CPI for February was 2.4%, and we can all expect that to jump for March. Energy prices alone, will drive inflation up by nearly a full percent, for the month of March. I would expect the overall y/y to be in the 3.2%+ range for March.

It should be noted that California prices will distort the national average. California is unique, due to nearly no access to the SPR (no pipeline, Jones Act), in direct competition with east Asia over Alaskan crude. Additionally, 30% of their crude imports ... comes through the Straits of Hormuz. California imports 60% overall. 

Simple math indicates 18% of their refinery inputs are in serious danger of being impacted. It would not be unreasonable to see the pump prices in California breaching the June, 2022 highs. Gasoline- $6.438; Diesel- $7.011.

Natural gas prices are not substantially higher and should not increase due to the situation in the Persian Gulf. The reason being simple... The U.S. facilities for processing NatGas to LNG are already at full operation. 

It is possible that various nation's SPR release might stem to spikes temporarily, but the capacity of withdrawal is one of the questions, as well as shipping availability. Ships can't magically appear overnight... at any given port.

Frankly, I see no easy solution. 

Globally, Asian countries are very vulnerable, with the exception of China.

Curiously, Iran has stated that crude priced in Chinese Yuan would be allowed passage. China might gleefully go along with that, but considering the impact on the yuan/dollar exchange rate, as well as holdings in dollars held by China... maybe not. 

Energy Inventory Update, and Some Geo-Political Thoughts

I guess it is no surprise that pump prices are rapidly rising... now standing at 11.5% above year ago levels.

How high could it go? That gets very complicated and depends on...

Past crude oil disruptions

Nothing really compares to the current situation. The 1973 Arab Embargo, targeted the U.S. and a few other countries, which were mostly unaffected. Notably, the U.S. experienced shortages and significant price hikes. The 1980 Iranian revolution impacted the global prices, but not the Straits of Hormuz. Again this impacted the U.S. with spot shortages and sharp price rises. 

That latter crisis did result in our current spot pricing structure, which ensures inventory across the different regions of the country.

The duration of closure of the Straits of Hormuz.

This is the determinant of future crude prices, natural gas prices, etc. As these are global commodities, the U.S. is not immune, as a net exporter of crude and LNG.

The 2nd part of the puzzle is shipping costs, which are usually included in those futures pricing. There are a lot of tankers, fully loaded and sitting stationary in that Gulf. Additionally, tankers are starting to pile up at the entrance into the Gulf. All those tankers are basically removing shipping capacity from the equation. 

We can all remember the high prices at the pump in 2008, which was caused by a much weaker dollar AND limited transport capability, due to our extreme dependence on imports at that time. 

Some basic math. 

Currently about 20 million barrels of crude passes through the Straits of Hormuz, each every day. Of that, less than 1 million barrels is shipped to the U.S. 3 million barrels are from Iran and generally goes to China. That leaves 16 million barrels for the rest.

The bulk of U.S. Imports are from Canada, which is largely captive by their government policies and is therefore highly dependant on the U.S. importing their product.

Certainly U.S. exports can rise, but a dramatic uptick in shipping would be hard to achieve, imo. U.S. Pump prices will most certainly rise, dependant upon duration of Straits of Hormuz closure, but there should be no shortages at the pump for at least 3 months. That might not be the case in other countries. 

Other overlooked factors

Deducting the 3mbpd exported by Iran to China, there remains 17mbpd of crude not passing through the Straits of Hormuz. That is approximately $1.3B per day of lost revenue to the exporters in that area.

With no ships entering the Straits of Hormuz, countries that are heavily dependent on food imports will experience possible sharp rises in prices, as well as potential shortages.

Summary

As someone that drives very little, an extreme jump in pump prices can be absorbed. As natural gas is a factor in electricity prices, I would expect an uncomfortable jump in that. With diesel prices jumping faster than gasoline and reliance on transportation of products... it will increase things I use on a regular basis.

For me... inflation is the story, NOT shortages, unless it would be shortage of money.